RUTHERFORD COUNTY, Tenn. (WGNS News) - Rutherford County Assessor of Property Rob Mitchell is accusing the Tennessee Comptroller’s Office and its Division of Property Assessments of pressuring local officials to adopt policies that Mitchell says would improperly increase property-tax revenue.

Meanwhile at a recent Board of Equalization meeting, State Representative Tim Rudd apologized for what he called unexplained and “unreasonable” behavior from the State Comptroller towards the Property Assessor of Rutherford County...

Mitchell said state officials have spent two years attempting to force Rutherford County to reclassify certain long-term, single-family rental homes from residential to commercial property. He argued that the proposed classification would significantly increase taxes based on how a property is owned rather than how it is used.

Representative Rudd suggested the Comptroller of the Treasury, responsible for overseeing the Division of Property Assessments (DPA), has been behind the push to increase what owners of investment properties pay in property taxes... The DPA division operates directly under the Comptroller's office to support local property assessors and monitor assessment procedures.

Further highlighting the push to keep property taxes where they are on single-family rental properties, Mitchell pointed to a July 24, 2026, administrative ruling involving TDG Properties LLC and TDG Byrdstown LLC, in which a judge reversed Sumner County’s commercial classification of 14 single-family rental homes. According to Mitchell, the ruling supports his position that homes used as single-family residences should not be classified differently merely because they are owned by an LLC that owns multiple properties.

Mitchell also cited a 2025 Tennessee Attorney General opinion and an earlier Tennessee Supreme Court decision that he says establish that property classifications should be based primarily on use rather than ownership.

The assessor further accused the Comptroller and DPA of using reimbursement demands, reassessment pressure, software requirements and threats of legal action to force counties to comply with state directives. He described those actions as coercive and claimed the state agencies exceeded their authority and misrepresented conditions in Rutherford County.

State Representative Rudd agrees with Property Assessor Mitchell, saying that the Comptroller should not be pushing this change onto local county property assessor offices...

Mitchell said his office will continue opposing the proposed classifications and defending Rutherford County taxpayers. He urged residents to contact their state legislators and demand greater oversight of the Comptroller’s Office, particularly during the 2026 election year.

FULL Public Statement from Rob Mitchell, Rutherford County Assessor of Property - For two years, Rutherford County has been under attack by the Tennessee Comptroller's Office and its Division of Property Assessments. They call it oversight. It is not. It is a coordinated campaign to bully a constitutional office into submission, and it has now been exposed for what it really is: an illegal revenue-generation scheme dressed up in the language of compliance.

Let me be clear. Rutherford County did not fail. My office did not fail. The tax system did not collapse. Every alarmist claim the Comptroller and DPA have put in front of the public was manufactured to create fear, not to state facts.

The centerpiece of this scheme was the push to force a broad reclassification of long-term single-family rental homes as commercial property — a legal theory the Comptroller and DPA have leaned on for two years to justify pressuring counties across the state. That theory just collapsed in court.

On July 24, 2026, a Tennessee administrative judge tore it apart in TDG Properties LLC and TDG Byrdstown LLC v. Sumner County Assessor's Office. Sumner County had reclassified 14 single-family rental homes as commercial for one reason only: the homes were owned by LLCs that held more than one property in the county. Every home was still a single dwelling, rented to a single family, no different in use than any residential home on the same street. The judge didn't just disagree — he called the county's approach "clearly erroneous," found it applied the law differently depending on who owned the paperwork, and reversed it outright. Every taxpayer in Tennessee should sit with that. When this theory is finally tested in front of a neutral judge instead of pushed through intimidation, it doesn't survive.

That's because it was never really about the law. It's about revenue. Reclassify a home from residential to commercial and its tax burden jumps overnight — not because anything changed about how the home is used, but because the state and its local enforcers decided they wanted more money out of it. The Attorney General's own 2025 opinion says these properties are generally residential. The Tennessee Supreme Court settled this fifty years ago: property is taxed by use, not ownership. None of that has stopped the Comptroller and DPA from pushing counties to inflate their tax rolls using a legal theory they knew — or should have known — could not withstand scrutiny. That is not regulatory guidance. That is a revenue grab, and it is illegal.

My job is to apply the law, not to enforce a revenue scheme dressed up as oversight. We will not be bullied into abandoning the Constitution. We will not manufacture legal cover for bad policy. And we will not let a state agency use its authority to strong-arm local officials into hitting a number.

The pattern is not subtle, and it is not accidental. Reimbursement demands. Pressure for countywide reassessment. Insistence that counties adopt the state's preferred software. Threats of legal action against officials who wouldn't move fast enough. And now, a reclassification scheme that a judge has already thrown out. Strip away the bureaucratic language and what's left is coercion, in service of a revenue target, aimed at local officials who answer to their own constituents — not to Nashville.

The Comptroller and DPA exceeded their authority, misrepresented the facts, and tried to force Rutherford County into a legal position that has now been tested and rejected. That should alarm every taxpayer in this state, because it means homeowners and small landlords across Tennessee — the very people who provide affordable rental housing in their communities — were targeted under a legal theory with no foundation, solely to generate more tax revenue.

This is bigger than one county. If state officials can bully a constitutional office here, they will do it anywhere. If they can push an illegal revenue scheme here, they have already tried it elsewhere, and they will keep trying until someone stops them. And if they can operate without real accountability, the public is the one who pays for it — literally, on their tax bill.

Rutherford County will stand on the law, on the Constitution, and on the truth. We will defend this office. We will defend our taxpayers. We will not back down, and we will not let this scheme go unanswered.

I am urging every citizen to contact their state representatives and state senators now. This is an election year. Voters should demand that their elected officials rein in the Comptroller before this illegal scheme does more damage to more Tennessee families. If those officials will not act, the public should remember who protected them and who didn't — at the ballot box.