The importance of agriculture to the state of Tennessee is undeniable, accounting for 9 percent of the state's economy and $57.6 billion in output. A new report from the University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture reveals the economic impact of agriculture by county.
For Rutherford County in 2015:
1) Total direct agricultural output is estimated at $1.0 billion. With multiplier effects, agricultural output has a total estimated economic impact of $1.4 billion. This means, for every dollar of direct output from agriculture, the total economic impact on the county's economy is $1.32 (i.e., the 1,353.1 divided by the 1,026.8).
2) There are 4,918 workers employed in county agriculture. With multiplier effects, an estimated 7,389 jobs are generated by county agriculture, or one direct agricultural job leads to 1.50 jobs (i.e., 7,389 divided by 4,918) in the county.
David Hughes, Greever Chair in Agribusiness Development and project leader, states that there is a real need for this type of analysis at the county level. "Many areas of Tennessee have new residents that are often unaware of local agricultural roots and the important role that agriculture plays in the local economy," says Hughes. "Even long-established residents are often unaware of this contribution."
Agricultural activity is spread out across fields, pastures and woods, and this lack of concentration can make its contribution much less obvious than that of a large factory. "The information in this report can be used to educate local leaders and the public at large regarding the contribution of agriculture and the necessity of resisting unwarranted encroachments on agricultural activities," adds Hughes.
To access the reports, go to ageconomicimpact.tennessee.edu and click on the county of interest. The webpage also provides training materials for those who wish to learn more about the method of analysis used to generate the reports.
The research was supported by Farm Credit Mid-America; Tennessee Cattlemen's Association; Tennessee Department of Agriculture; Tennessee Farm Bureau; and the Tennessee Soybean Promotion Board. It was also supported by members of the county-level agricultural economic impact workgroup that assisted in developing the final version of the reports.

